Posted by: Dale Wright on July 24, 2007 at 8:44 am - Trackback URL

After months of internal squabbling, members of the Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Inc. (IEEE) Higher Speed Study Group (HSSG) have finally agreed on a path to the next standard for high-speed Ethernet.

At a meeting last week, HSSG members approved the project authorization request (PAR) and the IEEE’s “five criteria” required for the study group to continue working on a new Ethernet standard that will include both 40Gbps and 100Gbps rates.

The agreement comes after six months of internal debates over whether the next standard should include a 40Gbps line rate, and a full year after the study group was founded.

The new standard will provide physical layer (PHY) specifications to support 40Gbps operation over at least 100 meters of multimode fiber, at least 10 meters of copper, and at least 1 meter over a backplane.

On the 100Gbps side, the standard will address distances of at least 10 km and 40 km on singlemode fiber; at least 100 km on multimode fiber; and at least 10 meters over copper.

The HSSG was formed to define the next Ethernet standard for network aggregation, and it seemed well on its way to advancing a 100Gbps proposal late last year.

But in January some members of the group, led by server and storage vendors such as Sun Microsystems Inc., Hewlett-Packard Co., and Brocade Communications Systems Inc., began pushing for a standard that included a 40Gbps rate for data-center applications.

A number of switching and routing vendors, including Cisco Systems Inc., rejected that idea, citing possible delays in the commercialization of 100-Gigabit Ethernet aggregation products, as well as the higher costs involved in developing and manufacturing products that comply with a dual 40- and 100Gbps standard.

In the end, the group was able to secure a large enough majority to adopt the proposal for a dual standard. In the five-criteria document, the HSSG noted that “bandwidth requirements for computing and core networking applications are growing at different rates, which necessitates the definition of two distinct data rates for the next generation of Ethernet networks.”

Specifically, a majority in the group decided that 40Gbps provided “the best balance of performance and cost” for servers and computing applications, while 100Gbps was the better speed for aggregation and core networks.

On the HSSG email reflector on Friday, study group chair and Force10 Networks Inc. components scientist John D’Ambrosia wrote that the IEEE 802.3 Executive Committee had approved the pre-submission of the group’s PAR to the New Standards Committee (Nescom) for consideration at the December 2007 Standards Association Standards Board (SASB) meeting, and that it would remain on the agenda subject to Executive Committee approval at the November meeting.

D’Ambrosia also noted that the Executive Committee had approved an extension of the HSSG, allowing it to continue working on defining the standard.

Brad Booth, president of The Ethernet Alliance , says that, despite the internal debates, he doesn’t expect much delay in the standardization process. “I would expect formal ratification sometime in 2010,” he says. “The real technical meat of the work can start, and has already. We’ve seen presentations that are very technical in nature, so we may have a first draft by next summer, which would put us in line with where we hope to be”

— Ryan Lawler, Reporter, Light Reading

Posted by: Dale Wright on May 24, 2007 at 8:12 am - Trackback URL

Nortel Networks Ltd. sees an opportunity to steal market share from router manufacturers through its provider backbone transport (PBT) business. Philippe Morin, president of Nortel’s Metro Ethernet Networks business, also said Nortel expects to announce a 40Gbps PBT product by the end of the year, during an investor conference call today hosted by Prudential Equity Group LLC analyst Inder Singh.

Nortel was an early supporter of PBT, a controversial technology designed to bring carrier-grade transport features at an Ethernet price point. But a number of equipment suppliers have recently joined the market, as carriers begin to look more closely at PBT.

The technology got a huge boost when BT Group plc announced it would be used in the carrier’s 21CN next-generation network project, a contract that Nortel and Siemens AG won. Outlining his company’s view of the PBT market and the opportunity in it, Morin touted Nortel’s first-mover advantage in the market, due to its early focus on PBT and its BT 21CN win.

The BT win was “a huge vote of confidence,” which has led to a number of trials and interest in Nortel’s PBT solution. “Since January [when the BT win was announced], we’ve been on a lot of planes and in a lot of meetings” with potential customers, Morin said.

Now Nortel believes it can win share in the Ethernet transport space and elsewhere in the telecom equipment market. Believing that in next-generation networks carrier Ethernet and optical technologies will continue to move together, Morin says this will provide an opportunity for Nortel to grab market share from traditional router manufacturers.

But he said that despite the company’s early success, it is continuing to enhance its PBT portfolio. As part of this initiative, Nortel is working on a 40Gbps PBT solution, which Morin said he expects to be launched by the end of the year.

The company is also participating in the standards process and working with other vendors in the PBT space on interoperability. Admitting that PBT is still in early stages of standardization, Morin said that the process is moving quickly but will probably take 18 months to two years to run its course.

Even so, customers don’t appear to be daunted by lack of standardization. “Customers like BT are comfortable with where [PBT] is now,” Morin said. “BT is not waiting for standards to get approved.”

Morin says Nortel is collaborating with PBT players to build ecosystems of vendors and suppliers, and to improve operability among them. He said that with many PBT vendors, Nortel is not competing head to head, but working together to offer end-to-end solutions to customers.

The real competition in metro transport, he says, isn’t coming from other PBT vendors, but from Multiprotocol Label Switching (MPLS) and VPLS (virtual private LAN service) competitors. While Nortel will work to create interoperability with MPLS, Morin believes that PBT offers advantages in metro networks, where “we don’t believe MPLS can scale.”

Despite the BT win and current trials with Tier 1 carriers, Morin believes in the short term that most North American PBT buying decisions will come from Tier 2 companies. Nortel is also targeting MSOs for PBT-based business services and wireless providers looking to extend wireless backhaul networks.

“We’re very happy with market movement and takeup,” Morin says. “We’re happy with the level of [customer] engagements.”

— Ryan Lawler, Reporter, Light Reading

Posted by: Dale Wright on April 5, 2007 at 4:00 pm - Trackback URL

Yokogawa Electric Corp. and Fujitsu Ltd today announced the joint development of what they claim are the world’s first practical 40Gbps optical transmission technologies using differential quadrature phase shift keying (DQPSK). The two companies say they are planning to incorporate the technologies in various new products for 40Gbps ultra high-speed optical transmission networks.

The proliferation of optical access networks that directly connect households via optical fibers and the construction of next-generation networks have led to a increasing demand for greater capacity in inter-city optical transmission networks. In order to meet this demand, carriers are considering an increase in maximum transmission speed from the 10Gbps of today’s optical transmission networks to 40Gbps.

Typically, when transmission speed is increased, distortion caused by polarization mode dispersion (PMD) becomes pronounced, limiting transmission reach. For example, transmission reach is limited to a maximum of 100 km when transmitting a 40Gbps signal using a standard binary modulation in an optical fiber that meets the PMD specification (0.2 psec per square-root-kilometer) recommended by the ITU-T. Thus, inter-city transmission, which requires long-distance transmission of more than several hundred kilometers, has not been possible.

Seeking to overcome this obstacle, advances are being made in investigating DQPSK-type transmission, which is tolerant to waveform distortion due to PMD, and its high performance has been confirmed in the laboratory experiments. However, the configuration of a DQPSK format is complex, and thus large size and high power consumption of the optical transceivers have proved to be challenges.

Yokogawa Electric and Fujitsu Limited, in cooperation with Fujitsu Laboratories Ltd, have successfully developed what they claim are the world’s first practical 40Gbps DQPSK optical transmission technologies, including:

DQPSK LN optical modulator
The LN optical modulator for DQPSK modulation, which was developed by Fujitsu and operates with the world’s lowest drive voltage, enables a compact optical transmission component design and lower power consumption.

Dedicated ICs and devices that enable DQPSK
Compact, low power consumption, dedicated ICs and other devices that enable DQPSK, including a driver device optimized for the DQPSK LN optical modulator; optical/electrical conversion devices that operate stably despite PMD waveform distortion; and clock and data recovery devices were developed with Yokogawa Electric’s InP Hetero-Junction Bipolar Transistor (InP HBT) technology.

Compact optical transmission module
Control technology was developed that allows the newly developed key devices to operate in a stable manner. The companies also developed a mounting technology that enables a compact size, making possible a compact 110- x 320- x 40-mm package equipped with all functions necessary for 40-Gbit/sec DQPSK in the transmission equipment and a low-power consumption of 35 W (with case temperature of 72 ° Celsius).

According to the companies, 100 units of 40Gbps DQPSK optical transceivers were manufactured, and transmission performance and stable operation–despite environmental changes such as temperature fluctuations and variations in supply voltages–were confirmed. Furthermore, the transmission reach as limited by PMD was found to be approximately eight times better than that of standard binary modulation, say the companies.

The resulting technology is expected to significantly reduce the time it will take to implement major inter-city high-capacity optical networks.

The new technologies were developed under a strategic partnership, established between Yokogawa and Fujitsu in March of 2006, to jointly develop core system technologies and key components for ultra high-speed optical transmission systems with the cooperation of Fujitsu Laboratories Ltd. Sample products were on display at last week’s OFC/NFOEC Conference in Anaheim, CA.

Posted by: Dale Wright on March 30, 2007 at 7:38 am - Trackback URL

ANAHEIM, Calif. — OFC/NFOEC — If 100Gbps Ethernet gathers pace quickly enough, it might put a crimp in the lifespan of the 40Gbps generation.

That’s one possibility being discussed here at OFC/NFOEC, as industry executives wonder whether 40Gbps might see a shortened lifespan due to pressure from both 10- and 100Gbps alternatives.

“We see the 40Gbps deployment as more of a stepping stone,” says Saeid Aramideh, vice president of marketing for CoreOptics Inc. “Not that we have stopped our activity there, but certainly we see our future being 100Gbps-based. My personal belief is that with the coming of 100Gbps transmission in the WAN, the 40Gbps life cycle could be short-lived.”

Metro and long-haul 100Gbps deployments are years off — most sources are saying 2012; AT&T Inc. has suggested 2010 — while 40Gbps deployments are underway now. AT&T has lit its OC768 backbone, and here at OFC/NFOEC, Verizon Communications Inc. officials said they also plan to build a 40Gbps core.

But here’s the catch. It’s generally accepted that for 40Gbps sales to take off, enabling 40Gbps to usurp 10Gbps, the cost should be no more than 2 to 2.5 times as much as 10Gbps. So far, 40Gbps prices aren’t there.

“The cost economics of 10Gbps are so strong right now, it’s limiting 40Gbps to only those cases where they have to use it,” says Roy Rubenstein, research director with the transceiver market research firm, LightCounting . A typical, short-reach, 40Gbps transceiver can carry a $20,000 to $25,000 price tag, he notes.

So, if 100Gbps optics manage to catch up by costing, say, about five times as much as 10Gbps, could that cut short the 40Gbps generation? “Depending on where 40Gbps moves, you might see an intercept point with 100Gbps, but it’s too early to tell,” says Mike Ricci, a senior vice president at JDS Uniphase Corp.

What might make that intercept point possible is the amount of attention being lavished on 100Gbps transmission. The 100Gbps name-dropping at OFC/NFOEC includes prominent vendors such as Alcatel-Lucent, Infinera Corp, and CoreOptics customer Siemens Communications Group .

“There’s a window for 40Gbps. If people get the prices right, they can have a chance,” LightCounting’s Rubenstein says.

The optics vendors pushing 40Gbps don’t appear too worried, considering 100Gbps transmission is still pretty far from reality. “If there’s a need for 100Gbps, it’ll happen, but at this point I don’t see a significant threat to the investments made in 40Gbps,” says Ed Cornejo, director of product marketing at Opnext Inc.

That doesn’t mean Opnext is ignoring the next wave, as it’s already engaging in 100Gbps laser research in its lab. On a panel at Monday’s Optical Society of America Executive Forum, Opnext CEO Harry Bosco said the tough part, when it comes to transceivers, will be finding the chips to work at that speed.

And recent M&A activity shows confidence in the upcoming 40Gbps market. Two of this week’s acquisitions — Kailight Photonics Ltd. by Optium Corp., and Kodeos Communications Inc. by Finisar Corp. — “show people are getting serious about their 40Gbps portfolios,” Rubenstein says. Kailight is shipping 40Gbps modules, while Kodeos, more of a 10Gbps vendor, uses long-haul encoding techniques that could be useful at 40Gbps, he says.

— Craig Matsumoto, West Coast Editor, Light Reading

Posted by: Dale Wright on March 27, 2007 at 8:04 am - Trackback URL

In a paper delivered today at OFC/NFOEC 2007 in Anaheim, CA, Alcatel-Lucent describes how it has developed a tunable optical waveguide equalizing filter that is fabricated entirely in a CMOS manufacturing line, the same manufacturing technology that produces electronic integrated circuits. Alcatel-Lucent says its breakthrough technology “eliminates the package walls separating the photonic circuit from the electronic circuit,” thereby opening the door to new optical networking architectures.

While the electronics industry is a multibillion-dollar per year industry, the photonics industry remains essentially a boutique operation. Components are built on separately optimized material platforms, including lithium niobate (LiNbO3), indium phosphide (InP), and indium gallium arsenide (InGaAs). As a result, the photonics market is fractured; each material sees a portion of the market, and none of the materials enjoy the economies of scale inherent in the electronics world.

“What we can envisage,” says Alice White, vice president of enabling technologies at Alcatel-Lucent Bell Labs, “is a world in which these two worlds—electronics and photonics—come together seamlessly on a single platform.” Consider, for example, her recently purchased hybrid car. “This car chooses when to use the gas engine and when to use the electronic motor based on which is best, efficiency-wise and performance-wise,” she explains. “Sometimes it uses both together, but it does this seamlessly. We could imagine, down the road, a situation in which the electronics and photonics are on the same chip. And thinking about trying to do that gives us some real architecture and design advantages,” White notes.

Of course, White and her team have gone beyond just thinking about it. They say they have developed a CMOS-compatible tunable optical equalizer that leverages inherent advantages from both the electronic and photonic worlds.

The research is funded by the Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency’s (DARPA’s) EPIC Program, or Electronic and Photonic Integrated Circuits Program. Alcatel-Lucent Bell Labs’ partners on the project include BAE Systems, which provides the CMOS foundry; MIT; Cornell University; and Applied Wave Research, a computer-aided design (CAD) vendor.

As dictated by DARPA’s EPIC Program, all deliverables have to be made in a commercial foundry. And while she admits that this was a formidable challenge, White also notes, “The fact that we can do it makes this all the more interesting. It really leapfrogs the tech transfer issue.”

Silicon-based tunable optical equalizer

Bell Labs says its zero/pole filters enable network operators to clean signals within a transmission channel on the silicon chip—either directly or by modifying the signal in anticipation of later distortion—as well as balance the power of different transmission channels. The key to the demonstration is a new control configuration that uses a single voltage to adjust the signal equalization and an innovative new architecture to realize complex responses in a low-order filter.

The base structure of the filter is a Mach-Zehnder interferometer. The filter itself is symmetric; light comes into the filter and is split among two ring resonators on the upper arm of the filter and two ring resonators on the lower arm. “What the rings do is create a nonlinear response in frequency,” explains Doug Gill, MTS, Integrated Photonics Research, Alcatel-Lucent Bell Labs. “The resonance makes the phase change in a very nonlinear way. We control how sharply that phase changes and where the phase change is located in frequency space. We call it ‘The Dance of the Resonances.’ We align them and tune them to get the response that we want,” he says.

At the output of the filter, the light from the two arms interferes constructively and destructively to get the desired type of magnitude response. “But,” says Gill, “you can also get the type of phase response that you want, and that’s why this filter can compensate both for intensity distortion across the profile of the channel and phase distortion across the profile of the channel.”

Sanjay Patel, technical manager of Integrated Photonics Research at Ball Labs says the team purposely selected a filter design for its first implementation of the technology in part because optical loss has historically been an issue. Silicon, by contrast, is a high index contrast material, which has enabled Bell Labs to make very tight bends and create an optical circuit that is much smaller than, say, a planar lightwave circuit (PLC)-based device. “It is about a factor of twenty smaller,” Patel reports.

Moreover, he asserts, using a combination of silicon and optics gives you “the advantage of doing the optical compensation ranges in compact form factors with electronic assist. So you kind of get the best of all worlds, and you can say, ‘I know where optics provides an advantage, and I know where electronics provides an advantage.’ I can seamlessly move between the two and complement the necessary strengths that both of these bring to the area of dispersion compensation, just as an example,” he adds.

Particularly in the case of dispersion compensation, there are advantages to doing that in the optical domain, notes Gill. When you go into the electrical domain, you lose the phase information of the signal. “So here is an example of where there is an inherent advantage of doing that particular process in the optical domain,” Gill says. “And then you can have the support of the electronics around that process to add electronic dispersion compensation on top to whatever degree might be necessary.”

While generally available technologies are not expected for 3 to 5 years, synergistically combining such optical filters with on-chip electronic circuits can provide a commercially viable path to providing reconfigurable, low-cost, low-power-consumption devices that could fit into small-form-factor pluggable modules, say Bell Labs representatives. These new devices also are ideal for dual-use applications in systems that route data over both electronic and optical networks, depending on the most appropriate delivery and/or transport format.

Eliminating walls

At the end of the day, says Bell Labs, this announcement is about tearing down the barriers between electronics and photonics that exist both in the physical world and in the mindset of network engineers. “What we’re trying to do here is stop that [mentality of] ‘Do it electronically’ or ‘Do it photonically,’” says White. “Instead, let’s just say, ‘In this particular functionality, what makes the most sense?’ And then not have a package wall separating the photonic circuit from the electronic circuit.”

Every time you have a package wall, adds Gill, you increase the cost and size of the device, and you introduce constraints on design. “When you have a package wall, you have to have some common standard mating characteristic between the various packages. Eliminating those package walls opens up new dimensions in component design.”

“We’re really thinking about these things in terms of not a fight between electronics and optics but a collaboration,” muses Patel. “There are synergies.”

Next Page
Outdoor Shop sex herbal v viagra soft tabs study uk cialis soft tabs body building from sports supplement viagra and pharmacy humor canadian rx cialis discount sales allwam mature big boobs party hardcore mature grany mistress SEX MOM GIRLS mature sex drunk nude party full free sex famous lesbian pornstar sex porno casting buy cialis cheap viagra sale uk viagra without prescription mail order viagra soft tabs cheap drugs best herbal levitra where to buy cialis soft tabs online porn sex mature videos porn blog sex teen porn videos porn